Table of Contents

What they saw

Methodology

BuzzFeed News describes their methodology as “BuzzFeed News interviewed 28 former detainees from the camps in Xinjiang about their experiences. Most spoke through an interpreter. They are, in many ways, the lucky ones — they escaped the country to tell their tale. All of them said that when they were released, they were made to sign a written agreement not to disclose what happens inside. (None kept copies — most said they were afraid they would be searched at the border when they tried to leave China.) Many declined to use their names because, despite living abroad, they feared reprisals on their families. But they said they wanted to make the world aware of how they were treated.

Claims

“The stories about what detention is like in Xinjiang are remarkably consistent — from the point of arrest, where people are swept away in police cars, to the days, weeks, and months of abuse, deprivation, and routine humiliation inside the camps, to the moment of release for the very few who get out. They also offer insight into the structure of life inside, from the surveillance tools installed — even in restrooms — to the hierarchy of prisoners, who said they were divided into color-coded uniforms 1) based on their assumed threat to the state.”

“Their accounts also give clues into how China’s mass internment policy targeting its Muslim minorities in Xinjiang has evolved, partly in response to international pressure. Those who were detained earlier, particularly in 2017 and early 2018, were more likely to find themselves forced into repurposed government buildings like schoolhouses and retirement homes. Those who were detained later, from late 2018, were more likely to have seen factories being built, or even been forced to labor in them, for no pay 2) but less oppressive detention.”

Corroboration

No corroboration provided. 3)

Rejection of claims

The use of inverted commas in statements from officials indicates scepticism or outright rejection of these explanations. No rationale for this scepticism is provided.

Testimony

Testimony 1 - Nursaule

Claims
Analysis
1)
No testimony provided
2)
No evidence provided
3)
“BuzzFeed News could not corroborate all details of their accounts because it is not possible to independently visit camps and prisons in Xinjiang.”
4)
If this is the case, the calculations made by Killing et al regarding floor area and the possible number of internees are invalidated
5)
Given that education achievements for ethnic groups lags the rest of China and that cultural pressure is exerted on girls to become mothers and wives, this would directly address the issue
6)
This would be a positive move if they were being detained
7)
Bali bombings occurred October 12, 2002. Maximum activity from Jemaah Islamiyah. Nervousness about those visiting the area would be warranted. In August 2003, Riduan Isamuddin (also known as Hambali), an important coordinator of Jemaah Islamiyah and Al Qaeda activities, was arrested by Thai forces, reportedly acting on a tip from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. On September 3, 2003, an Indonesian court convicted Abu Bakar Baasyir of plotting to overthrow the Indonesian government but dropped more serious charges, including accusations that he is the leader of Jemaah Islamiyah. Baasyir was sentenced to four years in jail. Prosecutors had asked for a 15-year sentence. Baasyir has said he will appeal the sentence.
8)
These documents have not been found
9)
This sounds like she has tried to introduce dogs to make some connection with Nazi Germany
10)
Acknowledging the role of fiction in memory. This raises the question as to whether this is a recollection or embellishment
11)
Contradicts earlier statements regarding blue uniforms. Supposed photos of camp 'inmates' do not support this testimony
12)
Subjective - these can be considered highly dangerous in the context of terrorism
13)
Recollection of categories indicates awareness of possible crimes that they may have committed
14)
Within the context of possible extremism, these questions would guide the interviewer as to likely radicalisation
15)
Consistent with intelligence gathering
16)
Probable evidence that attempts at radicalising were treated differently, indicating that the program was directed at terrorist or extremist activity, not an ethnicity, refuting claims of cultural genocide
17)
Confirming that the buildings had other facilities beside 'cells'
18)
Testimony about another prisoner
19)
Suggesting that accusations of routine beating and torture are fictional