The anti-China Propaganda Project attempts to document anti-China propaganda from many and varied sources. It attempts to provide easy access to direct sources and their sources. It also attempts to show how the propaganda operates to convince the reader. Key individuals and organisations are identified in both the promotion and push back against that propaganda. Some of these individuals advocate for terrorist activities; others seem content to smear China for personal or political reasons.

• Definition and a selection of key sources for smearing China
• Techniques used in propaganda * [[key individuals | Individuals who make smearing China a personal mission
• Organisations who, when reporting on China, inevitably find fault, criminal activity or human rights abuses
• Those who push back on propaganda
• Apologist for terrorist activities
• Common modes of smearing China
• Anti-Chinese narratives
• Media organisations that misrepresent China
• Think tanks
• Governments
• Arms manufacturers
• Extremist organisations
• Anti-China journalists
• Independent sources on China
• The motivations for anti-China thinking and propaganda
• How those who purport to be passionately defending human rights are not
• Accusations that Chinese people have no freedom
• 'Defending democracy' as an excuse for smearing
• Hit pieces defending China or smearing independent voices
• ' Accusations of being instruments of the CCP'

• Supposed imperialist, hegemonic or colonialist intentions
• Alleged human rights violations
• Supposed military aggression
• Alleged forced labour
• Economic dominance and the rhetoric of 'debt trapping'
• Genocide or ethnic erasure
• Coverup of COVID19
• China bullies Australia on trade
• Cultural destruction

===== Media organisations]] ABC

• Arms manufacturers gaining from anti-China propaganda
• Extremist organisations
• Journalists
• Independent sources
• Motivations for anti-China thinking and propaganda
• Human rights organisations creating anti-China propaganda
• Notions of state interference in individual liberties
• How the defence of democracy is frequently cited as grounds for anti-China invective.
• Individuals who push back on propaganda are often targeted for 'hit pieces', where their funding, motivation or integrity is attacked. These individuals are often portrayed as China 'shills', instruments of the CPC.
• Anti-China campaigns are intimately linked to the threat that China poses to US hegemony.
• Anti-propaganda writers, bloggers and vloggers often demonstrate how the propaganda is an extension of on-going and long standing US imperialism.

index page
academics | adrian_zenz | alleged_human_rights_violations | alleged_intent_to_dominate_economically | arms_manufacturers | aspi | convince | coverup_of_covid19 | cultural_destruction | daniel_dumbrill | darren_byler | debt_trapping | direct_sources | dw_budapest_university_story | english_translation_of_analysis_of_population_changes_in_xinjiang | extremist_organisations | genocide_or_ethnic_erasure | governments | greyfox | hit_pieces | human_rights | human_rights_watch | individuals_advocate_for_terrorist_activities | journalists | kerry_allen | key_individuals | lee_and_oli_barret | like_we_were_enemies_in_a_war | media_organisations | narratives | organisations | propaganda | push_back | sfy | smear_china | start | supposed_imperialism_or_colonialism | the_think_tank_behind_australia_s_changing_view_of_china | think_tanks | thread_regarding_zenz_and_his_religious_beliefs